Wednesday, 15 June 2016 06:12

US appeals court upholds ‘net neutrality’ rules


The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has announced in a judgement overnight that it has upheld the FCC’s "Open Internet Rules".

Back in February 2015, the US Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, voted for its contentious "Net Neutrality" rules, designed to, among other things, prevent blocking and throttling of content, and banning content companies from doing deals with ISPs to deliver content faster.

The FCC says its "Open Internet rules protect and maintain open, uninhibited access to legal online content without broadband Internet access providers being allowed to block, impair, or establish fast/slow lanes to lawful content".

There were naturally cries that this was a bad outcome for the Internet and businesses, and as often happens in the US, court cases ensued. There ish more information on the FCC’s "Open Internet rules" here

FCC chairman Tom Wheeler issued a statement stating: “Today’s ruling is a victory for consumers and innovators who deserve unfettered access to the entire Web, and it ensures the Internet remains a platform for unparalleled innovation, free expression and economic growth.

“After a decade of debate and legal battles, today’s ruling affirms the commission’s ability to enforce the strongest possible internet protections — both on fixed and mobile networks — that will ensure the Internet remains open, now and in the future.”

The court wrote: “Petitioners and their amici offer various grounds for distinguishing broadband service from other kinds of common carriage, none of which we find persuasive. Telegraph and telephone networks similarly involve the transmission of speech. Yet the communicative intent of the individual speakers who use such transmission networks does not transform the networks themselves into speakers."

However, just because a court has made a ruling does not indicate any kind of finality in the US court system, or at least, not until you generally get to the Supreme Court.

More below, please read on. 

CTIA chief executive Meredith Attwell Baker said in a statement: "The wireless industry remains committed to preserving an open Internet and will pursue judicial and congressional options to ensure a regulatory framework that provides certainty for consumers, investors and innovators.

"For the US to remain the global mobile leader, we need rules that help promote consumer access to 5G and the Internet of Things without subjecting the wireless industry to investment-chilling public utility regulation. In the interim, we urge the FCC to support innovative new services, like free data, that benefit consumers and reflect the highly competitive mobile market."

The court’s ruling can be read here in full as a PDF.

Not everyone at the FCC is pleased, however with FCC commissioner Michael O’Reilly stating: “The DC Circuit’s decision is more than disappointing, but I expect it to be appealed to the US Supreme Court so this opinion is not necessarily the final say. If allowed to stand, however, today’s decision will be extremely detrimental to the future of the Internet and all consumers and businesses that use it. We all will rue the day the commission was confirmed to have nearly unmitigated power over the Internet – and all based on unsubstantiated, imaginary ‘harms'.

"More troubling is that the majority opinion fails to apprehend the workings of the Internet, and declines to hold the FCC accountable for an order that ran roughshod over the statute, precedent, and any comments or analyses that did not support the FCC’s quest to deliver a political victory. It also confirms why every parliamentary trick in Congress was used to pack this particular court.”

Further statements are also available; FCC commissioner Ajit Pai has a say here, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel has her say here and FCC commissioner Mignon Clyburn has something to say here, too

In the meantime, the battles to come will clearly be anything but neutral!

Subscribe to Newsletter here

WEBINAR 12 AUGUST - Why is Cyber Security PR different?

This webinar is an introduction for cyber security companies and communication professionals on the nuances of cyber security public relations in the Asia Pacific.

Join Code Red Security PR Network for a virtual conversation with leading cyber security and ICT journalists, Victor Ng and Stuart Corner, on PR best practices and key success factors for effective communication in the Asian Pacific cyber security market.

You will also hear a success story testimonial from Claroty and what Code Red Security PR has achieved for the brand.

Please register here by 11 August 2020 and a confirmation email, along with instructions on how to join the webinar will be sent to you after registration.

Aug 12, 2020 01:00 PM in Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney. We look forward to seeing you there!



It's all about Webinars.

These days our customers Advertising & Marketing campaigns are mainly focussed on Webinars.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 2 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial.

For covid-19 assistance we have extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.


Alex Zaharov-Reutt

One of Australia’s best-known technology journalists and consumer tech experts, Alex has appeared in his capacity as technology expert on all of Australia’s free-to-air and pay TV networks on all the major news and current affairs programs, on commercial and public radio, and technology, lifestyle and reality TV shows. Visit Alex at Twitter here.





Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News