Thursday, 08 October 2020 06:13

US Supreme Court may send Google-Oracle case back to lower court Featured

US Supreme Court may send Google-Oracle case back to lower court Image by Mark Thomas from Pixabay

The US Supreme Court has raised the possibility that the long-running battle between Google and Oracle could be sent back to a federal appeals court in order that the search company's claim that its use of Java APIs in Android was covered by fair use.

Bloomberg reported that the judges also questioned Google's claim that it could not have created code to do the same function as the APIs without forcing developers to learn a new language.

The highest court in the US agreed to hear the case in November last year in order to decide whether Oracle should receive damages from Google for copyright infringement.

Hearings were scheduled for March but were put off due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Justice Neil Gorsuch told Google's lawyer Thomas Goldstein on Wednesday that Apple and other firms had "come up with phones that work just fine without engaging in this kind of copying".

Chief justice John Roberts expressed doubts about Google's actions, likening them to someone who broke into a safe.

“Cracking the safe may be the only way to get the money that you want, but that doesn’t mean that you can do it,” he told Goldstein. “If it’s the only way, the way for you to get it is to get a licence.”

Court filings by Oracle show Google has earned US$42 billion (A$58.8 billion) in revenue from Android between 2007 and 2016.

A number of technology companies, among them Mozilla, Microsoft and IBM are backing Google in the case. Media and entertainment companies are also behind the search behemoth. A ruling by the court is due in July next year.

The Trump administration has backed Oracle, saying that though the appeals court's ruling was not entirely "free from doubt", on balance the Federal Circuit Court had gotten it right.

Solicitor-General Noel Francisco wrote at the time: “Google copied 11,500 lines of computer code verbatim, as well as the complex structure and organisation inherent in that code, in order to help its competing commercial product.

He added: "Unauthorised copying harmed the market for respondent’s Java platform.”

The case has been around since 2010 when Oracle sued Google shortly after it purchased Sun Microsystems and became the owner of Java, claiming that Google had violated its copyright and patents. Google was accused of taking more than 11,000 lines of code from Java APIs and using it in Android without any commercial agreement.

That case ended in 2012 with Google being largely the victor. The presiding judge, Justice William Alsup, ruled that APIs could not be copyrighted.

But an appeal gave Oracle what it wanted: a ruling that APIs could be copyrighted.

In a second trial that ended in May 2016, a jury found that Google's use of the Java APIs in Android was covered under fair use. As expected, Oracle was not happy with the verdict.

Oracle initiated an appeal in February 2017 having indicated after the May 2016 verdict that it would not take a backward step. In August 2016, Oracle tried to get the verdict set aside, but was this was refused by Justice Alsup. Later the same year, the database giant filed the necessary papers to prolong the battle.

Finally, on 28 March, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit came to the conclusion that Google's use of the Java APIs was "not fair as a matter of law".

In August 2018, the US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Google's bid to have the case reheard. This meant that the decision — that Google's use of the Java APIs was "not fair as a matter of law" — would stand, and the search giant would have to fork out US$8.8 to billion to Oracle or else try to take the case to the Supreme Court – as it did.

Google then went to the Supreme Court in 2019, seeking to have the highest court in the US again rule on the dispute.

Please join our community here and become a VIP.

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here
JOIN our iTWireTV our YouTube Community here


It's all about Webinars.

Marketing budgets are now focused on Webinars combined with Lead Generation.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 3 to 4 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial. Plus a video interview of the key speaker on iTWire TV which will be used in Promotional Posts on the iTWire Home Page.

Now we are coming out of Lockdown iTWire will be focussed to assisting with your webinatrs and campaigns and assassistance via part payments and extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs. We can also create your adverts and written content plus coordinate your video interview.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.



iTWire TV offers a unique value to the Tech Sector by providing a range of video interviews, news, views and reviews, and also provides the opportunity for vendors to promote your company and your marketing messages.

We work with you to develop the message and conduct the interview or product review in a safe and collaborative way. Unlike other Tech YouTube channels, we create a story around your message and post that on the homepage of ITWire, linking to your message.

In addition, your interview post message can be displayed in up to 7 different post displays on our the site to drive traffic and readers to your video content and downloads. This can be a significant Lead Generation opportunity for your business.

We also provide 3 videos in one recording/sitting if you require so that you have a series of videos to promote to your customers. Your sales team can add your emails to sales collateral and to the footer of their sales and marketing emails.

See the latest in Tech News, Views, Interviews, Reviews, Product Promos and Events. Plus funny videos from our readers and customers.


Sam Varghese

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous