Lead Machine Pink 160x1200

Lead Machine Pink 160x1200

iTWire TV 705x108notfunny

Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

Friday, 29 January 2010 13:28

Canonical copyright assignment policy 'same as others'

By

Canonical chief executive Mark Shuttleworth has called for an uniform copyright assignment policy for contributors to free and open source software projects.


He told iTWire that while many companies and institutions used such assignment to include contributions in projects of which they were the primary copyright owner and contributor, "they all use divergent contracts, and it would be good to standardise and harmonise those".

Shuttleworth was reacting to queries raised in connection with an article in the Linux Weekly News where editor Jon Corbet had expressed reservations about the Canonical policy. Corbet mentioned that he had asked Canonical some queries but received no answers over the course of a couple of days.

(It must be noted here that Canonical took less than three-and-half hours to provide a detailed response to iTWire's queries; the delay in publishing this article is solely because this writer was on holiday.)

Elaborating on his point, Shuttleworth said, "for example, Intel required copyright assignment for contributions to Clutter and other projects. Novell to Moblin. Red Hat has a number of contributors' agreements too. There's a long list of those agreements; a few of them are poisonous but they are the rare exception.

"The guidance at Canonical is that we encourage our employees to sign copyright assignment agreements for the projects they participate in (as far as I know we've done so for MySQL, Zope, FSF, Novell, Red Hat, Intel and others) in order to facilitate the upstreaming of their work. There are variations on the language used. Canonical's was highlighted in a recent LWN article, but I think the article created the very mistaken impression that Canonical's agreement is materially different from any of the others I've mentioned."


Shuttleworth is the founder of the Ubuntu GNU/Linux distribution and, due to its popularity, every move that Canonical, the company behind it, makes, comes in for intense scrutiny, at times by those with no affiliations, but often by those who are deeply conflicted.


"All copyright assignment agreements empower dual licensing, and relicensing, and as a result such projects attract more investment than other projects which don't create the same opportunities for underwriting companies," Shuttleworth said.

"Canonical's agreement is not in any sense unusual in that regard - except that the folks who wrote it chose to try to reassure people that we are only asking for contributions on projects where we publish a free version. There are variations on the theme - some take a 'licence back' approach rather than an assignment, others use an 'unlimited licence'; those variations seem mainly driven by the preferences of the particular legal department that drew up the agreement."

He said most copyright assignment agreements also included IP clauses to prevent trojan contributions. "Again, there is variation in the language used, but the intent in all cases is the same, and Canonical's approach is, in my view, simpler and cleaner than most.

"If you chat with (FSF legal adviser) Eben Moglen about this, he makes a very compelling case for the dangers to companies of accepting contributions without such an agreement in place - which is one of the reasons the FSF does so."

Shuttleworth said such agreements were easy to demonise. "The most common complaint I've heard is 'why can't a company accept my patches to them under the same licence that they give me the original code?' But that suggests that the two contributions are equal, when they really are not. One party contributes a whole working system, with a commitment to continue to do maintenance on it, the other contributes a patch which is (generally) of no value without the rest of the codebase. "


He said: "The one very interesting grey area is that of plug-ins and extensions, where the contribution could well be a whole work in its own right.


"The only place I've seen that question get ugly, though, is in the OpenOffice.org project, between Sun and Novell (both of which require copyright assignment on specific projects)."

Careful analysis of the real source of contributions to major open source projects would "support the idea that corporate investment and participation in the ecosystem, usually with copyright assignment, has been a major positive force in getting the free software stack to the point where it is today. It's not the dominant factor, but it's vital."

And he took a potshot at some of the whiners, saying: "The folks who appeared to be complaining about Canonical's agreement in the LWN article are the same folks who in the past have said Canonical makes no contribution to the open source ecosystem.

"How ironic that their complaint should centre on a project that Canonical underwrites! They also mostly work for companies that have their own copyright assignment requirements for their own projects.

"I would very much like to see a common contributor agreement, and Canonical would likely adopt standard language that addressed the key points that all the major current agreements address."

Read 11042 times

Please join our community here and become a VIP.

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here
JOIN our iTWireTV our YouTube Community here
BACK TO LATEST NEWS here

GET READY FOR XCONF AUSTRALIA 2022

Thoughtworks presents XConf Australia, back in-person in three cities, bringing together people who care deeply about software and its impact on the world.

In its fifth year, XConf is our annual technology event created by technologists for technologists.

Participate in a robust agenda of talks as local thought leaders and Thoughtworks technologists share first-hand experiences and exchange new ways to empower teams, deliver quality software and drive innovation for responsible tech.

Explore how at Thoughtworks, we are making tech better, together.

Tickets are now available and all proceeds will be donated to Indigitek, a not-for-profit organisation that aims to create technology employment pathways for First Nations Peoples.


Click the button below to register and get your ticket for the Melbourne, Sydney or Brisbane event

GET YOUR TICKET!

PROMOTE YOUR WEBINAR ON ITWIRE

It's all about Webinars.

Marketing budgets are now focused on Webinars combined with Lead Generation.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 3 to 4 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site itwire.com and prominent Newsletter promotion https://itwire.com/itwire-update.html and Promotional News & Editorial. Plus a video interview of the key speaker on iTWire TV https://www.youtube.com/c/iTWireTV/videos which will be used in Promotional Posts on the iTWire Home Page.

Now we are coming out of Lockdown iTWire will be focussed to assisting with your webinars and campaigns and assistance via part payments and extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs. We can also create your adverts and written content plus coordinate your video interview.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.

MORE INFO HERE!

BACK TO HOME PAGE
Sam Varghese

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous

WEBINARS ONLINE & ON-DEMAND

GUEST ARTICLES

VENDOR NEWS

Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News

Comments