Wednesday, 27 May 2020 10:36

Second US bid to curb Huawei may end up like the first Featured

By
Second US bid to curb Huawei may end up like the first Image by Cristian Ibarra from Pixabay

ANALYSIS The first attempt by the US, a year ago, to cripple Chinese telecommunications equipment vendor Huawei Technologies and prevent it from manufacturing its products has been mostly a failure, with the only definitive outcome being the success in banning the company from using the proprietary version of Google's Android mobile operating system.

Now the US has embarked on a second round of strictures which are aimed at achieving what it failed to do with last year's listing of Huawei on the Entity List. American firms cannot sell products made in the US with more than 25% of American content to companies placed on this list without obtaining a licence.

There was a way around it: American companies which wanted to continue selling to Huawei simply supplied the Shenzhen-based firm through their outlets located outside the United States. When it came to Android, Huawei started using the open-source version and adding its own playstore app, admittedly not the best solution, but no block to selling its smartphones in China.

Before one proceeds any further, one should make it clear that if Huawei's purchases were not in the billions, then no American company would jump through a single hoop to supply it with even a single widget. As that old tired saying goes, money makes the mare go.

But Huawei is big business. And apart from that, any company that treats it favourably gets a tick of approval from the Chinese Government, something that cannot be discounted in a world where numerous big American companies cut their costs considerably by manufacturing goods in China. Intel, for example, last year got US$20 billion of its US$72 billion in revenues from China, according to The Economist.

The second attempt to restrict Huawei by the Americans is through the Foreign Direct Product Rule. This specifies that products made using American technology or equipment cannot be sold to companies on a Department of Commerce list, unless a licence is obtained.

This restriction, which also covers non-American companies, is aimed mainly at blocking the supply of semiconductors to Huawei; if the Chinese company cannot obtain sufficient supplies, then it would not be able to make both its smartphones and its 5G base stations.

But then whenever a law is drafted, there are highly-paid lawyers who examine it and find loopholes. Huawei does not order semiconductors directly; it provides the designs to its contractors, who then get their orders filled from the maker, build the equipment and send it directly to the customer. This is one loophole which the Americans will need to plug, though how is uncertain.

As The Economist puts it, one of the big difficulties the Americans face is the fact that the semiconductor business is spread around the globe to such an extent that it will be difficult to police.

The FDPR restriction can be got around by not using American equipment to make semiconductors; Japanese firms Tokyo Electron and Hitachi High-Technologies are just two names that suggest themselves as alternative sources of high-quality machinery.

In fact, there has even been a suggestion the announcement last week by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that it would set up a factory in Arizona was made so it could move its American equipment to the Arizona plant and then use equipment from other countries to make semiconductors in Taiwan. Those could, of course, be supplied to Huawei without any violation of American rules.

The Economist also cites the fact that the chief of Samsung, another major player in the semiconductor industry, toured its new factory in Xian, China recently; Samsung has indicated clearly that it does not intend to ignore China when it comes to this branch of its business. And it could use non-American equipment to avoid any run-ins with Washington.

As a last resort, companies holding patents on tool making could always shift their patents abroad and avoid American restrictions altogether. All these factors put together could, in the end, drive part of the semiconductor industry out of the US, not exactly the outcome that power brokers in the US expect.


Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here

Active Vs. Passive DWDM Solutions

An active approach to your growing optical transport network & connectivity needs.

Building dark fibre network infrastructure using WDM technology used to be considered a complex challenge that only carriers have the means to implement.

This has led many enterprises to build passive networks, which are inferior in quality and ultimately limit their future growth.

Why are passive solutions considered inferior? And what makes active solutions great?

Read more about these two solutions, and how PacketLight fits into all this.

CLICK HERE!

WEBINAR INVITE 8th & 10th September: 5G Performing At The Edge

Don't miss the only 5G and edge performance-focused event in the industry!

Edge computing will play a critical part within digital transformation initiatives across every industry sector. It promises operational speed and efficiency, improved customer service, and reduced operational costs.

This coupled with the new capabilities 5G brings opens up huge opportunities for both network operators and enterprise organisations.

But these technologies will only reach their full potential with assured delivery and performance – with a trust model in place.

With this in mind, we are pleased to announce a two-part digital event, sponsored by Accedian, on the 8th & 10th of September titled 5G: Performing at the Edge.

REGISTER HERE!

BACK TO HOME PAGE
Sam Varghese

website statistics

Sam Varghese has been writing for iTWire since 2006, a year after the site came into existence. For nearly a decade thereafter, he wrote mostly about free and open source software, based on his own use of this genre of software. Since May 2016, he has been writing across many areas of technology. He has been a journalist for nearly 40 years in India (Indian Express and Deccan Herald), the UAE (Khaleej Times) and Australia (Daily Commercial News (now defunct) and The Age). His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous

WEBINARS ONLINE & DEMAND

GUEST ARTICLES

VENDOR NEWS

Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News

Comments