Home Core Dump Open second-level .au domains - cui bono?

Author's Opinion

The views in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of iTWire.

Have your say and comment below.

Open second-level .au domains - cui bono?

auDA, the body responsible for the management of the .au namespace, is considering allowing second-level domain registrations such as myname.au. Who would benefit?

At present, the .au namespace is divided into a small number of second level domains (2LDs). Those open to individuals and organisations are .asn.au and .org.au (for non-profits, etc), .com.au and .net.au (commercial entities and traders), and id.au (individuals).

But auDA's names policy panel is considering whether the second level should be opened up, opening the doors to names such as qantas.au or stephenwithers.au.

This seems to be driven by the experience with new (and extremely expensive) top-level domains (gTLDs) that have been introduced over the last three years, along with the liberalisation of various country-code top level domains (ccTLDs) such as Singapore (.sg), the United Kingdom (.uk) and New Zealand (.nz).

So who would benefit?

Most obviously, the domain registration industry. The infrastructure is in place, and so an increase in the number of domains available for registration would presumably improve revenue and profits for very little new investment. According to the paper, "the majority of .uk direct registrations are held by the registrant of the matching co.uk name."

So if it were possible to register mcdonalds.au, it seems likely that it would end up with the well-known fast food chain, not to one of the businesses in the automotive, construction, electrical, health, plumbing, transport or other sectors that have 'McDonalds' in their name. Even if a relatively small company did manage to secure it initially, the temptation to part with it for a good payday would be considerable.

Furthermore, auDA's current policy would prevent the successful registrant of a new 2LD would not be allowed to 'subdivide' it by acting as a registrar outside the existing system. Some people will see that as an anti-competitive measure, others will see it as a way to ensure the technical stability and integrity of .au.

And if you see direct registrations in .au as a way of opening up the total domain space, note that the policy in New Zealand was that if an existing name in at least two second levels had gone to different registrants (a local equivalent would be withers.com.au and withers.net.au), then it is unavailable for registration in .nz (think withers.au) until those registrants have resolved the conflict between themselves - with no time limit. On top of that, in the absence of a conflict, established registrants in any of the pre-existing .nz 2LDs were given the first chance to register those names in .nz.

Back in Australia, according to the paper there has been little interest in the .melbourne and .sydney gTLDs, with less than 6,000 or 4,000 registrations respectively.

But the argument that this shows there will be little demand for defensive registrations isn't very convincing, especially when one of the possibilities is that registration requirements for .au will be more relaxed than for .com.au. Surely that would mean existing registrants couldn't rely on existing policies to protect their names, and so they would increasingly turn to defensive registrations in .au, even if they didn't feel the need to register the .net.au name that corresponds to their .com.au.

So apart from the off-chance of a windfall profit, it's hard to see how most organisations would benefit.

Would the proposal make life any easier or more convenient for the typical internet user? Probably not. It saves a few keystrokes - e.g., qantas.au vs qantas.com.au - but casual observation suggests that a lot of people just type qantas or another name into the box and let Google or Bing find the URL for them.

The answer to the question "who benefits?" (cui bono) might be found in another cliched expression: "follow the money."

If you'd like your opinion on the matter heard, read the issues paper [PDF] and then either make a written submission or complete the online survey (instructions are on the first page of the paper) by midnight on 1 June 2015.


Did you know: 1 in 10 mobile services in Australia use an MVNO, as more consumers are turning away from the big 3 providers?

The Australian mobile landscape is changing, and you can take advantage of it.

Any business can grow its brand (and revenue) by adding mobile services to their product range.

From telcos to supermarkets, see who’s found success and learn how they did it in the free report ‘Rise of the MVNOs’.

This free report shows you how to become a successful MVNO:

· Track recent MVNO market trends
· See who’s found success with mobile
· Find out the secret to how they did it
· Learn how to launch your own MVNO service


Stephen Withers

joomla visitors

Stephen Withers is one of Australia¹s most experienced IT journalists, having begun his career in the days of 8-bit 'microcomputers'. He covers the gamut from gadgets to enterprise systems. In previous lives he has been an academic, a systems programmer, an IT support manager, and an online services manager. Stephen holds an honours degree in Management Sciences and a PhD in Industrial and Business Studies.