Open Source Market Segment LS
Open Source Market Segment RS
Monday, 09 July 2007 10:55

How open is "open" when Microsoft say it?


The U.S. state of Massachusetts is considering re-instating approval for internal use of Microsoft Office 2007 after a two-year ban. The draft policy is up for review until July 20.

The issue at the heart of the matter is open vs proprietary file format standards. Microsoft Office 2003, and previous versions, did not have an open file format whereas the current 2007 incarnation of the popular productivity suite provides Office Open XML (OOXML).

The benefits of open file formats are many, not least being the assurance of accessing archived data created using applications that no longer exist as well as being able to open documents created by current-version apps which are not installed on the desktop. A frequent example of the latter is the multitude of Microsoft Works word processing documents which are mailed daily and originate from the myriad of home computer users who have free bundled copies of Works OEM with their new PCs. Yet, they cause untold consternation to hapless office workers who don't understand why they have no success when double-clicking the attachments in their mail client. (Ironically, these are invariably the same office workers who try Microsoft Word's File/Open dialog as the first port of call to opening PDF files.)

Insightful, if cynical, news site The Register believes there's more at play.

In particular, The Register asserts the state of Massachusetts were pushing for Microsoft alternatives such as the well-regarded open-source suite OpenOffice. The move to actively boycott a Microsoft product was previously unheard of and invoked the Redmond giant's lobbying machine to pressure the legislature to change policy.

It'd be too easy to just say the state of Massachusetts is kowtowing to Microsoft. After all, OOXML has been ratified by Ecma and surely this means it is been independently considered a global standard, open to all, and vendor-neutral, right?

viagra cialis levitra comparison

Actually, no. Ecma is not the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). It is not a body of the ISO. According to their own web site, "Ecma is the inventor and main practitioner of the concept of "fast-tracking" of specifications drafted in international standards format through the process in Global Standards Bodies like the ISO." In other words, Ecma will help those wishing to attain ISO accreditation by managing the red tape and bureaucracy and contacts and by pushing through your documents.

The C# language has been submitted to Ecma. C# is Ecma-approved (ECMA TC39/TG2 in fact.) This means any vendor should be able to adopt C#. Yet, does anyone seriously believe anyone other than Microsoft is able to extend the language?

Similarly, OOXML is before Ecma as draft standard TC45. In principle, the world is better with a single document format that works well enough for all vendors and end-users. Yet, there is obviously an agenda at hand which is not considering all vendors as equal.

As evidence, consider that Microsoft has now put their Open Paper Specification (OPS) before Ecma. The clear scope put forth for this standard is to be "fully compatible with the Office Open XML Formats" and to "enable the implementation of the Office Open XML Formats." This is quoted from Ecma's TC46 charter.

In other words, Microsoft is deviously using Ecma to ratify as standard a set of document file formats that co-operate with each other but are distinctly Microsoft owned and driven and inter-related - and moreso the standard must align with the product, not the other way around.

Perhaps this may be tolerable if there were no alternatives but it must be understood that the ISO has already approved ODF, the OpenDocument Format, also based on XML. This file format has been standardised and given an ISO number and is backed by heavyweights like IBM. Is there value in having two ISO standards for the same purpose?

Microsoft put forth the argument that OOXML is sufficiently different: ODF is constrained because it needs enhancements to support the detritus accumulated over the different versions of Microsoft Office's evolution - yet OOXML will also need to cater for this. It seems a hollow argument to say an entirely new open specification is required. Given ODF exists, and that PDF is already a de-facto standard for electronic document exchange, one really must question the significance of Ecma-approval and the genuineness of the word "open" in Microsoft's parlance.

Read 10171 times

Please join our community here and become a VIP.

Subscribe to ITWIRE UPDATE Newsletter here
JOIN our iTWireTV our YouTube Community here


Thoughtworks presents XConf Australia, back in-person in three cities, bringing together people who care deeply about software and its impact on the world.

In its fifth year, XConf is our annual technology event created by technologists for technologists.

Participate in a robust agenda of talks as local thought leaders and Thoughtworks technologists share first-hand experiences and exchange new ways to empower teams, deliver quality software and drive innovation for responsible tech.

Explore how at Thoughtworks, we are making tech better, together.

Tickets are now available and all proceeds will be donated to Indigitek, a not-for-profit organisation that aims to create technology employment pathways for First Nations Peoples.

Click the button below to register and get your ticket for the Melbourne, Sydney or Brisbane event



It's all about Webinars.

Marketing budgets are now focused on Webinars combined with Lead Generation.

If you wish to promote a Webinar we recommend at least a 3 to 4 week campaign prior to your event.

The iTWire campaign will include extensive adverts on our News Site and prominent Newsletter promotion and Promotional News & Editorial. Plus a video interview of the key speaker on iTWire TV which will be used in Promotional Posts on the iTWire Home Page.

Now we are coming out of Lockdown iTWire will be focussed to assisting with your webinars and campaigns and assistance via part payments and extended terms, a Webinar Business Booster Pack and other supportive programs. We can also create your adverts and written content plus coordinate your video interview.

We look forward to discussing your campaign goals with you. Please click the button below.


David M Williams

David has been computing since 1984 where he instantly gravitated to the family Commodore 64. He completed a Bachelor of Computer Science degree from 1990 to 1992, commencing full-time employment as a systems analyst at the end of that year. David subsequently worked as a UNIX Systems Manager, Asia-Pacific technical specialist for an international software company, Business Analyst, IT Manager, and other roles. David has been the Chief Information Officer for national public companies since 2007, delivering IT knowledge and business acumen, seeking to transform the industries within which he works. David is also involved in the user group community, the Australian Computer Society technical advisory boards, and education.

Share News tips for the iTWire Journalists? Your tip will be anonymous




Guest Opinion

Guest Interviews

Guest Reviews

Guest Research

Guest Research & Case Studies

Channel News