You see, this copper will be used to connect the 5100 or so FttN cabinets to the roadside pillars that contain the Telstra copper pairs that connect to homes. And of course the copper from the pillars that connect to homes is in excellent condition. We know this how? Why because nbn CEO Bill Morrow told us so!
So now in our brave new FttN world we have two sets of copper cable to maintain – thousands of kilometres of copper cable that connect from cabinets to pillars and many more thousands of kilometres of twisted pair copper cables connecting from pillars to homes.
But this is fine, some say, because as we all know Australia is geographically large and we have to accept that we simply need to buy huge loads of copper to cover our big fat wide land.
Thus, spending hundreds of millions on new copper to connect to old copper, both of which will have to be maintained and replaced on a regular basis, is indeed a relevant issue.
As has been pointed out in many journals — here’s one — while fibre cable to the premise is more expensive than copper cable in the short run, it is less expensive, costs less to maintain and has less downtime in the long run. What’s more the cost of fibre and its installation continues to go down.
Was a ubiquitous FttP network going to be built? Despite the naysayers, yes it was already underway and, when the NBN is finished, even under the current MTM plan 20% of the NBN will be FttP.
Will the FttN network be rolled out faster than the FttP would have been? Yes, but nowhere as faster as we were led to believe.
Will the MTM network, including the FttN component, cost less than a ubiquitous FttP network to build? Over the short term yes, but over the long term no because of the maintenance costs associated with FttN copper.
So once again, horn honkers, yes transparency and performance of the NBN are important, but so is the costly investment being made in yet more copper for more than 40% of Australia’s National Broadband Network.